December 5, 2012

Princeton public school children will be attending three additional days of school in 2013 — February 15, April 1, and June 20 — to make up for days lost during Hurricane Sandy.

In the event of more cancelled school days, the Board of Education has identified May 24, June 21, and June 24 as potential make up days.

In addition to approval of these dates, last week’s meeting of the Board of Education included a discussion of annual election dates. Offered the choice once before, the school board opted, by a five to four vote, to keep elections for new and returning school board members and budget approval in April. The Board’s discussion last week anticipated voting once again on the April-or-November question at its next meeting, on December 18. As they did before, members of the Board spoke to both sides of the issue.

Superintendent Judy Wilson offered some background on the question, noting that, for many decades, every public school district in New Jersey was required to hold April elections. Princeton was joined by about 70 other districts that kept April elections in 2012; she suggested that this year, “we may be the only district staying in April.”

By opting to move to the November general election Princeton would save about $40,000. The downside of that, according to some, is loss of the municipality’s ability to vote on the year’s proposed budget, and an overshadowing of educational concerns by other elections occurring at the same time. Ms. Wilson noted that only between nine and eleven percent of Princeton’s potential voters usually participate in the April election, and that the coming election will be the first time that Princeton voters will be voting as one entity, rather than electing Borough and Township representatives.

“I still believe that the public has a right to vote on any part of their tax bill, since we are up to 50 percent of the local property tax,” said Board President Tim Quinn, defending April elections. “It’s an exercise in democracy.”

Mr. Quinn pointed out that a particularly well-qualified candidate for the Montgomery school board was defeated in November because the excitement of the presidential election overshadowed an opportunity for the community to get to know her. Giving Perth Amboy as an example, Mr. Quinn also expressed concern about “the presence of outside groups” and “outside money” that have “tried to undo the action of duly elected board members.”

Noting that she is the last school board member to have been elected by the Borough, nine-year board veteran Rebecca Cox said that she would like to see the New Jersey Education Association (NJEA) “look at each and every ballot and determine whether quality vs. quantity informs who is elected.” She suggested that being in a minority of districts still holding elections in April may make it difficult for Princeton to get the NJEA’s attention. Typically, she reported, the NJEA responds to arguments that November elections become “too political” by saying that most school boards are already “heavily political,” and being run by local machines. She said that NJEA regards the practice of staying in April as “quaint.”

Citing the cost savings and the fact that more voters turn out for the general election, Board member Dan Haughton spoke in favor of moving the election to November, “if we really want to encourage democracy,” while Afsheen Shamsi, spoke in favor of April elections, and focusing “solely on education issues.”

Mr. Haughton said that since recent budgets have been limited by a two-percent cap, the loss of the community’s ability to vote on the budget “won’t make a lot of difference; it’s pretty much a given what the budget is going to be.” Ms. Wilson and Ms. Cox countered by saying that maintaining the public budget vote (i.e., keeping the April election) is “risky,” because when a budget is voted down, it goes to the governing body. Dorothy Bedford seemed to support keeping an April election by suggesting that the Board wouldn’t “want the public to have the impression” that the Board is “cavalier” and budgets all the way up to the two percent cap. “We’re usually somewhat below,” she observed.

Ms. Cox worried, however,
that time spent promoting each year’s budget takes school officials away from time spent educating students.

Community input on the election question is encouraged, and comments can be made on school district’s website, www.princetonk12.org.

In other business at the Board meeting, Student Achievement Committee Chair Andrea Spall reported on Princeton High School Principal Gary Snyder’s request that asterisks indicating levels of achievement be removed from students’ names on graduation programs.


August 8, 2012

A referendum to support proposed school building improvements at a total cost of approximately $10.9 million will be on the ballot for Princeton voters this September 24. If passed, the Board of Education has estimated the tax impact of the bond at less than $155 annually for the average assessed home in Princeton.

New Jersey school districts hold public referendum votes to seek approval of dedicated funding to improve and upgrade school facilities. If approved by Princeton voters, this funding can only be used for the designated school improvements.

On a district-wide basis, the improvements С and what they hope to accomplish С include replacing selected mechanical units and controls for more efficient operation of mechanical systems to reduce operating costs; lighting and controls upgrades to enhance energy efficiency and reduce operating costs; replacement of roofing at older sections of roofs; exterior upgrades including doors, windows and security; and selected paving, drainage, and upgrading of playgrounds and ball fields. Interior upgrades include flooring, casework and door replacement; and IT and network upgrades.

At Princeton High School, track and field upgrades will be made with bleacher and press box replacement. Other proposed improvements include brick re-pointing to repair areas of masonry to address leaks and deterioration; classroom upgrades to floors and ceilings; fixed furnishings replacement; an enhancement of the Americans With Disabilities Act-compliant ramp at main entrance for increased accessibility; emergency generator circuit upgrades; and locker replacement at selected locations.

A new media center and renovations to the old library are being proposed for John Witherspoon Middle School, along with audio, lighting, seating, and air-conditioning improvements in the auditorium. A new generator will operate key systems within the school in the case of an emergency.

Written approval of the proposed referendum from the N.J. Department of Education is pending.

Once it is approved by voters, the district will prepare plans, publicly bid, and award the projects. It is anticipated that all projects will be completed within the next 18-24 months. The district noted that the projects have been “carefully identified” as integral to “maintaining a healthy, safe, and sustainable learning environment.”

The district argued that the improvements cannot be paid for with the existing school budget. They point out that school districts in New Jersey are subject to budget caps that limit the ability to fund larger capital maintenance projects, such as roof or window replacements and similar types of repairs. As a result, districts must find other streams of revenue to fund needed capital maintenance. The New Jersey Development Authority is not an option, because it is currently not awarding any new grants for facility projects. “As of today,” a Princeton Public School spokesperson said, “there is no indication that grant funds will be made available to support the work identified in this referendum.”

It was also noted that “only projects with an extended useful life (more than 10 years) will be addressed” in the Princeton Public School (PPS) referendum.

“This work is necessary to maintain the condition of the schools and improve the efficiency of systems, reducing future operating costs,” according to the district. “Also of key importance is maintaining the proper facilities to support the high performance tradition of Princeton Public Schools.”

The current economic environment was cited as resulting in lower construction bid prices that will enable “this necessary work to be undertaken now by the district at lower costs. If not done now,” a district press release noted, “these improvements will still be needed in the future and would cost more to undertake.”

Absentee ballot registration forms are available on the Mercer County Board of Elections website and will soon be available on the district’s new website, www.princetonk12.org under “Board of Education — Elections”


June 20, 2012

A check from Princeton Education Foundation (PEF), representing $113,500 in donated funds to the Princeton Public Schools for improvements in technology, music, and vocal equipment in the elementary schools, was presented to the Board of Education at its most recent meeting.

PEF is a nonprofit that raises money each year to support local public school initiatives. This year’s gift is comprised of contributions from several different sources, including the PowerUp PRS! Technology campaign, which the Princeton Education Foundation is overseeing in concert with the school district; two gifts from district PTOs; and from PEF itself.

Other new technology will be made available next year through an approved New Jersey State contract, providing $453,385 for the purchase of iPad, MacBook, iMac computers and related supplies. The new equipment will enable instruction in specific language arts, math, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills in elementary grade pre-kindergarten through grade 1 classrooms; grade 6 through 8 math and science classrooms; and grade 9-12 English, math, science, and world languages classes. Individual teacher-issued technology will also be upgraded where needed.

In response to proposals received by district health benefits broker Connor Strong Buckelew, the Board approved the appointment of Express Scripts/Medco as the prescription benefits carrier, effective July 1, 2012, replacing BeneCard, whose contract will terminate effective June 30, 2012. The change was made in response to a perceived “need to control rising health care costs, and in an effort to save money for the district and the staff paying contributions towards coverage.”

Incoming staff include Princeton High School (PHS) Spanish teacher Maria Benedetto; John Witherspoon Middle School Science teacher Janet Gaudino; Caitlin O’Connor, a new fourth grade teacher at Littlebrook Elementary School; and PHS Social Studies teacher Patricia Manhart. All of their appointments are effective September 1.

Last week’s meeting also included recognition of retiring staff members for their many “years of service to Princeton children.”

The Board of Education will meet again Wednesday, June 20, at 5:30 p.m. at the Valley Road Administrative Building. They will discuss personnel issues and contract ratification, and participate in a workshop about their work in the coming school year. The meeting is open to the public.

The Princeton Public Schools’ website is www.prs.k12.nj.us.

For more information about the Princeton Education Foundation, visit www.pefnj.org.


February 22, 2012

Two members of the Board of Education, Township resident Mia Cahill and Borough resident Charles Kalmbach, whose terms are up this year, have chosen not to run for reelection in the upcoming April 17 election. A third, Borough resident and School Board President Rebecca Cox, has confirmed that she will run again.

While Board secretary Stephanie Kennedy reported that (as of press time), the Board has not received any applications for either of the open seats, Ms. Cox said that she is “in discussion” with several potential candidates. The “Board Candidate’s Packet,” delineating requirements for board membership and application procedures, is available on the Princeton Regional Schools’ website. The deadline for applying is February 27.

Ms. Cahill, a lawyer, was twice elected to the school board and has served since 2006. Her current committee responsibilities include chairing the strategic action plan committee, and serving on the personnel committee. Mr. Kalmbach, director of continuing education and vice president for strategy at the Princeton Theological Seminary’s School of Christian Vocation and Mission, has served a single term since his election in 2009. Mr. Kalmbach currently chairs the finance committee, and is a member of the external affairs committee and negotiations team.

“It’s been a great privilege to represent my neighbors in the Borough and to work with members of the Board of Education for the last three years,” said Mr. Kalmbach in a recent interview.

In response to a question about why he has chosen not to run again, Mr. Kalmbach went back to his original reason for joining the board, which, he said, was “to address major issues that were looming in the area of finance.” Under his stewardship, the finance committee has helped the Board to come up with balanced budgets in the face of state caps that have limited the district’s ability to raise revenue; large expenditures (e.g., health care, the charter school, and providing for special needs students) over which the district has no control; and a loss of reserves to the state.

“I’ve never in my years of business seen a situation like this,” said Mr. Kalmbach as he enumerated these obstacles. “Coming forward with a balanced budget every year has been an extraordinary accomplishment.”

Mr. Kalmbach also lauded the district for responding to the call for increased transparency. “I’m told that we are one of the half-dozen districts in the state that actually meets (twice a year, in point of fact) with its outside auditor to make sure we are in compliance with state regulations and doing what is right for the community.”

Now that the Board has completed an analysis of the amount of money the charter school receives ($4.5 million) and what they believe it actually would cost to educate its students ($1.35 million), Mr. Kalmbach suggested that his successor look at “what the charter school is giving back to the town in return for its investment.” The April 17 election will be the last time that Board members representing the Township and the Borough will run. After January, 2013, individuals will be elected by the residents of the consolidated municipality.

Other current members of the Board of Education include Vice President Tim Quinn, a Borough resident whose term expires in 2013; Township resident Dorothy Bedford, whose term also ends in 2013; Afsheen Shamsi, a Township resident whose term expires in 2014; Township resident Molly Chrein, whose term will be up in 2013; Dan Haughton, a Township resident whose term expires in 2014, and Borough resident Andrea Spalla, whose term will be up in 2013.

February 1, 2012

The choice between an April or November election and a prospective name change for the Princeton Regional School District (PRS) were the focus of the Board of Education’s Tuesday evening meeting last week.

As a result of new legislation, every municipality in New Jersey must decide whether or not they want to keep school board elections in April, or move them to the November general election. Superintendent Judy Wilson noted that time was of concern in reaching a decision on the question, since an April election would mean filing petitions by February 29.

The fact that Princeton will be a consolidated entity in January of 2013 adds complexity to board discussions, she continued. Since it will no longer be a “regional” school district, Ms. Wilson explained, it will be necessary to change PRS’s name. (While the high school’s arrangement with Cranbury will not change, it is not defined as a “district.”) The new name will be incorporated into the current revamping of the district and individual schools’ websites.

Vice-President Timothy Quinn made clear that the name change will not lead to additional expenses for the district. “The district will use every sheet of existing letterhead before the name change must take effect on January 1, 2013, and there are no signage considerations,” he said.

Superintendent Judy Wilson observed that the naming options are very limited, with Princeton Public Schools and Princeton School District standing out as two viable possibilities. It was noted that the word “public” in “Princeton Public Schools” may complicate the picture if it subsumes existing and future charter schools in the municipality.

Arguments for moving to a November election include sharing the overhead costs associated with running an election with other municipal departments. The district now pays around $40,000 for each April election. Of equal or perhaps greater consideration is the fact that voter turnout is significantly less in April than in November. The statewide average for April is approximately 11 percent, with Princeton showing a slightly better 14 percent. It was estimated that Princeton voter turnout in November, especially in a presidential election year, could run upwards of “80 or 90 percent.”

In the event of a November election, current school board members coming up for election will be asked to serve an additional eight months, through the end of the year. Board members, who currently represent the Borough and the Township, would serve out their terms and be replaced by candidates elected “at large” by the new municipality. The number of board members would remain at nine, each serving a three-year term.

Another consideration for the board and the community is that an April election would give voters a chance to vote on the annual school budget; a November election would not, leaving it up to the Borough and Township this year, and the consolidated entity in the future. In selecting the month in which they want to have the election, school boards will be making a four-year commitment.

Ms. Wilson also noted that consolidation into a single municipality takes effect in the middle of the school district’s fiscal year. As a result, residents will be paying the respective tax rates in the Borough and Township for six months, and one blended tax rate set by the County Tax Assessor after January 1.

Although Ms. Wilson said that there would be “no determinations” regarding the name change or election date change that evening, some board members weighed in on the issues. Molly Chrein expressed concern about the “partisanship” that might spill over into a November school board election that coincides with other races. In response, Ms. Wilson noted that ballot specifications for the school race ensured that they would look significantly different from anything else that appears on the ballot. She also reminded listeners that school board members take an oath not to make decisions on partisan issues.

School board member Daniel Haughton argued for a November election, saying that it would result in a “better alignment of board members and the budget process.” Describing it as “one more step in taking away local control of schools,” another board member, Charles Kalmbach, expressed concern about the loss of “accountability” that would occur if the elections are held in November.

Discussions of these and other issues are continuing on the board’s Facebook page.

The board also agreed that the impact on school enrollment caused by the 300-plus new housing units that will be built at the current hospital site, and the faculty and graduate student units that are planned for the old Merwick site, could be significant.

Among board president Rebecca Cox’s announcements at the beginning of the meeting was the recent tentative contract agreement reached with district school teachers in the Princeton Regional Educational Association (PREA) and the school board. Pending ratification by PREA members, the board will vote on the contract at a special meeting scheduled for Tuesday, February 7.

January 11, 2012

A marathon negotiation session between the District and the teachers’ union that continued from 4:30 p.m. Thursday afternoon until shortly after 5 a.m. on Friday did not result in a much hoped-for contract between the Princeton Regional Education Association (PREA) and the Board of Education (BOE).

As has happened in the past, the two sides’ subsequent versions of what transpired were at odds.

“The PREA Negotiations Team regrets to report that we do not have a new contract. The Board has already left the building,” said a 5:15 a.m. statement from PREA representatives.

Later in the day, PREA President Joanne Ryan elaborated. “PREA was cautiously optimistic going into Thursday’s 4:30 p.m. session,” she said, noting that this was the fourth meeting that included a mediator. “At 5 a.m. Friday morning, while waiting to hear from the BOE, our team was stunned to learn from the mediator that the session was over,” said Ms. Ryan.

“It’s hard to feel valued and respected when the BOE team felt it was appropriate to end the negotiations session and leave the building without letting us know they were calling it quits,” continued Ms. Ryan “Needless to say, it was a disappointing end to a marathon session. I hope the BOE is willing to continue the conversation with us.”

Superintendent Judy Wilson’s take on the meeting was decidedly upbeat. “The Board and PREA teams met from 4:30 on Thursday afternoon until 5 a.m. Friday morning and made great progress,” she said. “Without all issues resolved by 5 a.m. the decision was made to adjourn.”

Prior to the meeting, Ms. Wilson told PREA negotiations chair John Baxter that she remained “not just hopeful but confident that contract issues can be resolved this week.”

“The Board team hopes to regroup next week and meet again soon thereafter in order to move forward,” Ms. Wilson said in her comments after the all-night meeting. Ms. Ryan simply reported that no new meeting has been scheduled.

Describing it as “confidential” information, both sides in the negotiations declined to talk about which issues are sticking points. “No details can be released as per agreement on ground rules with the PREA,” said Ms. Wilson.

“The specifics of the issues in dispute are confidential and can’t be discussed,” said Ms. Ryan.


December 21, 2011

Although the Princeton Regional School District (PRS) and teachers in the system have been described as “being close to an agreement” on a new contract in the months since the previous contract ended on June 30, that goal remains elusive. At last week’s Board of Education meeting, comments by Princeton Regional Education Association (PREA) president Joann Ryan and other PREA members were deemed inconsistent with the evening’s agenda and out of order.
“Anyone attending the Board meeting on December 13 witnessed first-hand, the disrespectful treatment by Board of Education (BOE) President Rebecca Cox, as she attempted to quash comments from members having to do with negotiations claiming that it was not an agenda item,” said Ms. Ryan early this week. “The BOE President clearly commented on negotiations during item D of the agenda, the President’s Report,” she continued. “For her to try to shut down further discussions of negotiations by claiming it was not an agenda item, when she commented on negotiations during the President’s Report was disingenuous and disrespectful to the PREA membership.”
Teachers’ comments to the contrary, however, School Board President Rebecca Cox has asserted that “Teachers who are working with expired contracts are NOT working ‘without’ one.”
In a PRS statement released after the meeting last week, Ms. Cox pointed out that “Union members still have all of the protections and benefits of the expired contract,” noting, however, that “salaries have to remain at last years’ level until a new contract is ratified, and starting July 1, health-care contributions had to comply with new state law.”
Teachers came to last week’s meeting bearing signs like “Princeton Teachers Want to Settle Now.” “The PREA leadership is frustrated,” said Ms. Ryan on Tuesday evening. “We have heard the Board say publicly that they want to settle our contract and yet behind closed doors, there is no evidence of that fact. Instead of working collaboratively on a solution that is acceptable to both parties, the Board is demonstrating a disrespectful attitude toward our negotiations team and our entire membership.”
Ms. Cox’s statement emphasized the “new environment” in which school boards, teachers and community members now find themselves. The last time a contract was negotiated was in 2008, before the economy crashed, she noted. “The unemployment rate is still high, the economic recovery is fragile, and the state government continues to make major decisions that impact New Jersey’s school districts, sometimes in negative ways.”
“A lot of these changes are directly affecting our district,” continued Ms Cox. “Three years ago, the cap on the property-tax levy was twice as high, health-care contributions were lower, and raises statewide were double what they are today. Now we are in a new fiscal reality in the state, in the nation, and in the world. The state tax-levy cap is now 2 percent and recent settlements around the state reflect that. In contrast, three years ago the cap was 4 percent, and the settlement rate was about 4.5 percent.”
“Actions speak louder than words,” said Ms. Ryan. Quoting Superintendent Judy Wilson as having recently said that “‘We know that children’s levels of comfort, confidence, and trust matter every bit as much as academic achievement and excellent instruction,’” Ms. Ryan wondered about what “happens when trust and confidence in district leadership are lost? What happens to that ‘excellent education?’”
In the meantime, PREA members have begun daily after-school demonstrations on the sidewalk near the Valley Road Building, where the PRS administration is housed. “We want to make sure that we’re not forgotten,” said Littlebrook science teacher Martha Friend on Monday. Ms. Friend noted that groups of about 25 teachers from all the district schools would be taking turns each afternoon, excluding pre-holiday Fridays.
In the midst of contentiousness, both teachers and the district have expressed interest in working together. “PREA and the Board of Education should be partners, supporting this district of excellent teaching and learning for all our students,” said Ms. Ryan in her comments at last week’s meeting. “This is about all of us working together to reach a resolution,” Ms. Cox similarly observed in her press release. “We are ready with our proposals and looking forward to our next mediation session on January 5.”