Vol. LXIV, No. 13
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
The Princeton Board of Education capped a lengthy discussion last Thursday by unanimously passing a proposed school budget that will have a tax impact of 3.9 percent on Township and Borough residents.
Noting that her power point presentation that evening will be available on the districts website (www.prs.k12.nj.us/ ), Superintendent Judy Wilson presented the latest iteration of the proposed 2010-2011 budget, which had already changed from the one presented the week before. She noted that specifics would continue to be in flux during the coming weeks, and that the web version will be routinely updated, until election day, April 20, to reflect these changes.
Many of the points discussed at a budget workshop held the previous week were repeated on Thursday, with the additional news that the State had approved neither a waiver on the 21 percent increase in the cost of health benefits, nor the opportunity for residents to be asked a second question that might have provided for additional revenue on the ballot.
The budget presented on Thursday was based, Ms. Wilson explained, on an existing shortfall of $3.4 million, along with the loss of $3.7 million in revenue as a result of cuts to state support. The 3.9 percent tax increase will still result in a budget that is 3.54 percent, or $2.6 million less than last years, and doesnt begin to offset general revenue loss. The dire fiscal situation is compounded, Ms. Wilson said, by the loss of revenue from interest on investments, the loss of per capita tuition from diminishing numbers of Cranbury students enrolled in the district, and Cranburys own severe budget cuts. It was a beautiful partnership, Ms. Wilson observed regretfully.
While PRSs budgets have historically been informed by the goal of excellence, the theme of this years budget, Ms. Wilson reported, is eyes on the instructional core. We must respond to the official formula guiding state aid to New Jersey, she said, noting that Princetons tradition of over-adequacy and spending more than the median meant that it was now being more harshly penalized by the five percent cut the Governor has implemented in an effort to bring every district to a median spending level.
Ms. Wilson noted that parents should not be misled by the fact that class size will remain the same in the coming school year. The proposed loss of some 50 positions, including both professional and staff employees, she said does affect the support of teachers and students, as well as summer and after school programs, elective offerings, supplies in every department, and athletics. She anticipated cuts to the elementary schools world language program, as well as to art and music offerings for grades K through eight.
The district does not yet know exactly whose contracts will be affected by current union negotiations, Ms. Wilson reported. She also said that central office administration has voluntarily taken a wage freeze, and that several exceptional individuals have submitted their retirement paperwork early to help minimize the impact of the cuts.
Your voices at the doors of legislators really matter, Ms. Wilson said, citing a link on the districts website for making contact. The State is still mulling over the details of a retirement plan that will take effect in August, she pointed out, adding that legislators are realizing that theyre only adding to the unemployment ranks.
Ms. Wilson said that the district may be creating additional human resources lines in order to hire fundraisers. And, she said, there will be more outsourcing and privatization in the years to come.
Finance Committee Chair Dorothy Bedford sounded a more temperate note by observing that This is not a rude awakening, but rather an opportunity to rethink how we do business, from joint purchasing agreements, to changes in custodial time, to restructuring how we deliver services. She added that safety will be a primary issue in making athletic cuts.
Board member Tim Quinn commended teachers for their professionalization in continuing to work under difficult conditions. Another Board member, Mia Cahill observed that We have very little control over what happens, and that today may be the beginning of the end of excellence in the PRS system.
Ms. Cahill read a statement from Board member Walter Bliss, who was not able to attend the meeting. Citing a lack of cooperation from unions like the Princeton Regional Education Association (PREA) and the failure of the districts two charter schools to contribute to the Districts budget, Mr. Bliss suggested asking the Governor for an extension on the budget and tabling any layoffs until April 30. Ms. Wilson indicated that scheduling deadlines precluded any postponements.
Theres never been a stronger opportunity to negotiate with unions, observed Borough Council member David Goldfarb, who also praised Ms. Wilsons familiarity with the budget and all the issues it entails.
A member of the audience who asked not to be identified noted that New Jerseys five highest-achieving school districts spend less per capita than Princeton, and that the Board might learn by examining their budgets. Weve looked at them ad nauseum and theyre very misleading, responded Board President Alan Hegedus.
It was noted that although Thursday was the last official meeting for Mr. Hegedus and member JoAnn Cunningham, both of whom have chosen not to seek reelection, their work would be celebrated at the Boards April meeting.
Ms. Wilson encouraged residents to attend an April 13 public forum at the Princeton Public Library at which she, Library Director Leslie Burger, and others will discuss the impact of budget cuts on their respective institutions.
Town Topics® may be purchased on Wednesday mornings at the following locations: Princeton McCaffreys, Coxs, Kiosk (Palmer Square), Krauszers (State Road), Olives, Speedy Mart (State Road), Wawa (University Place); Hopewell Village Express; Rocky Hill Wawa (Route 518); Pennington Pennington Market.
Copyright© Town Topics®, Inc. 2011.